When Does Age Truly Matter?
The cliché “age does not matter in love” has often been invoked to justify another well-worn saying: “all is fair in love.” While some argue that age is just a number, others believe it carries significant weight depending on the context. The relevance of age becomes particularly evident in areas such as health, leadership, and politics, where physical and mental capabilities are key considerations.
Age brings two inevitable challenges: the gradual decline of physical stamina and, in some cases, mental acuity. However, exceptions to this trend exist. Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Juan Ponce Enrile, for instance, continues to serve under the Marcos administration, having celebrated his centenarian milestone on February 14 last year. His longevity and sustained participation in public service defy expectations, serving as a testament to the resilience and vitality some individuals retain even in their advanced years.
In politics, the question of age becomes even more pronounced, especially during elections. Older candidates are often lauded for their wisdom, experience, and deep understanding of governance. Decades in public service can provide them with a rich perspective, enabling them to navigate complex challenges with a steady hand.
However, some believe advanced age may present limitations. Governing a country requires not just intellectual sharpness but also physical stamina, quick decision-making, and the ability to manage crises effectively. A leader’s health, particularly in advanced age, often becomes a focal point of public scrutiny, raising concerns about their capacity to handle the demands of office over a full term. For instance, during election campaigns, questions about a candidate’s fitness often dominate public discourse, influencing voter perceptions.
Additionally, in today’s fast-paced and rapidly changing world, younger candidates are often viewed as better equipped to address the concerns of a younger, more dynamic population. They are perceived as more adaptable, innovative, and attuned to emerging trends in technology, climate change, and social issues.
That said, the debate over age in politics is not a matter of extremes but of balance. A candidate’s age is far less important than their ability to lead effectively. What truly matters is their vision, physical and mental fitness, adaptability, and capacity to inspire and unite people.
In the end, the question of when age matters is not about the number itself but about how it aligns with the demands of the role and the expectations of the people being served. The right leader is one who can rise to the occasion, address the challenges of the present, and build a better future.
In this year’s forthcoming elections, it is worth noting that some candidates are well past their late 70s, while others are staging a political comeback despite having already completed their previous terms in office. This trend has led some to perceive that traditional politicians view politics as an extension of their “retirement plan,” prioritizing personal ambition over public service.
This reality leaves voters with a critical decision: to either retain these long-serving politicians, granting them the privilege of holding onto power indefinitely, or to consider electing a younger generation of leaders. These fresh faces often bring proven stamina, energy, and a renewed perspective to governance, qualities that may be essential for tackling the pressing challenges of modern times.
Ultimately, the discretion lies with the electorate to decide whether to perpetuate the cycle of political dynasties and entrenched power or to take a chance on new leadership capable of driving meaningful change. The choice made at the ballot box will shape the nation’s trajectory, making it crucial for voters to weigh their options carefully and prioritize the greater good over personal allegiances or familiarity.
An alternative to traditional politicians who have entrenched themselves in power must now be prioritized, as the era of perpetuating the same faces in leadership must come to an end. Those who attempt to position themselves as mere extensions of these long-standing political figures risk raising skepticism and doubts among discerning voters seeking genuine change and fresh perspectives.
Among the Top Three Contenders in this year’s congressional race, Gladys Vergara stands out as the youngest. In contrast, Atty. Mauricio Domogan, a seasoned politician, is 78 years old, while Sol Go, the wife of incumbent Congressman Mark Go, is reportedly in her eraly 70s. This is not to undermine Domogan’s extensive experience in public service; however, his advanced age may pose limitations in terms of physical and mental agility. Similarly, while Sol Go may draw some support due to her association with her husband, being the spouse of the sitting congressman does not necessarily guarantee the votes she anticipates to secure her bid for power.
Given the foregoing, it seems clear that if we seek a strong and genuine alternative, your guess is as good as mine—though I would confidently place my choice on Gladys Vergara.
